Lance Armstrong’s doping case caused changes in anti-doping policies

Significant changes occurred in several types of sports after the USADA published its report on Lance Armstrong. The legendary American cyclist was using anabolic steroids and other related drugs throughout the whole athletic career but he never tested positive for any banned drug. He applied certain effective methods to prevent detection. Nonetheless, finally he turned out to be guilty of doping.
Lance Armstrong’s doping case has shown that anti-doping policies failed. So, they must be changed. Otherwise, competitions will be unfair. We’ll never distinguish real sports heroes.
These aspects influenced not only on cycling but also on other sports. Several sports organizations stated that anti-doping programs should be altered in order to catch those that use steroids and/or other related medications.
Not only anti-doping agencies but also athletes claim that anti-doping programs should be modified. Certain sportspeople desire to be sure that their sport is clean. For example, some tennis players believe that more drug testing should take place in tennis. It is interesting to note that such tennis stars, as Novak Djokovic, Roger Federer and Andy Murray, consider that anti-doping policy is not quite efficacious in tennis. They argue that more drug testing is required in order to be sure that tennis is free of doping.
Novak Djokovic claimed that he would submit to more drug testing in order to promote cleaning tennis of dopers.
Roger Federer also said that more tests for banned products should be conducted in tennis. He mentioned that earlier he was subjected to more tests. Then the number of tests became more reduced in tennis.
When it comes to the tennis player Andy Muray, he affirmed that more out-of-competition testing should be conducted. While tennis players are always subjected to drug testing during competitions, they are not tested often while being not in competitions.