California legislators: rights of athletes are violated by anti-doping agencies

Lawmakers of California claim that anti-doping agencies violate fundamental constitutional rights of sportspersons suspected of doping. Thus, athletes that have never tested positive for any prohibited products are targeted. That’s why the legislators initiated a request to Congress to review this issue.
It is known that the USADA is sponsored mainly by taxpayers. The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) gives 10 million dollars every year. This governmental office promotes fighting against intake of forbidden medications. Its goal is to exterminate illicit manufacture and drug use, crimes connected with application of illicit drugs, etc.
The request of California legislators was initiated soon after the 7-time Tour de France winner Lance Armstrong decided not to appeal his lifetime ban from professional sports.
Everyone knows that the celebrated cyclist Lance Armstrong has lost his 7 titles won at Tour de France. He was also banned from competitions completely.
Summer Lance Armstrong filed a lawsuit against the USADA, claiming that his constitutional rights were violated. But the judge Sam Sparks didn’t agree to accept the lawsuit. He confirmed that the USADA acted appropriately. He also said that the USADA was established in order to clean sports from sportspeople who use prohibited substances.
California Senator Michael Rubio confirmed that the judge didn’t act properly, refusing to accept the lawsuit against the USADA. So, the senators confirmed that the USADA violated rights of some sportspersons. That’s why they presented the request before Congress.

Barry Bonds is ready to support athletes suspected of doping

Barry Bonds knows what an athlete experiences, when he/she is targeted by feds and anti-doping officials. He understands what this person feels. That’s why the former professional baseball player can sympathize and support sportspersons suspected of doping. Thus, Barry Bonds supports the former American cyclist Lance Armstrong.
During an interview a journalist asked Barry Bonds about troubles of Lance Armstrong linked with doping suspicions. The former baseball player expressed his admiration towards the cyclist. He affirmed that Lance Armstrong was the greatest cyclist that has ever been in the sport of cycling.
Of course, Barry Bonds realizes what he says. He understands what it means to be a good cyclist. After this athlete retired from baseball, he became a cyclist. He participated in several competitions successfully. Being a cyclist, Barry Bonds sees that this sport has the same troubles like baseball. He sees that cyclists are pursued by federal prosecutors and anti-doping officers like professional baseball players.
Both Lance Armstrong and Barry Bonds were suspected of doping. They were prosecuted by feds and anti-doping officials.
Federal prosecutors accused Barry Bonds of lying about administration of forbidden preparations and obstruction of justice. They couldn’t prove that the athlete lied about intake of prohibited preparations. But feds found him guilty of obstructing justice. Barry Bonds decided to appeal the decision of the court.
When it comes to Lance Armstrong, the government dropped the case against him. But the USADA continued to target the cyclist. The USADA claimed that Lance Armstrong had been using prohibited preparations throughout his cycling career. The cyclist decided to discontinue fighting against accusations of the anti-doping agency. He lost his Tour de France titles and money he had received at these events.
Although Lance Armstrong has been stripped of his titles, Americans continue to respect him. They claim that he is the most brilliant cyclist of all times. Lance Armstrong’s sponsors haven’t refused to support his cancer charity. The former cyclist helps people to fight against cancer. So, many individuals are thankful. They will never forget what Lance Armstrong has done for them.
Barry Bonds’ reputation has been spoiled by accusations related to intake of prohibited drugs. The former baseball player hopes that his achievements during the baseball career are more significant than the suspicions. He believes that people will forget about the suspicions and he will be considered to be a baseball star.

Nadezya Ostapchuk’s coach worried about performance of this shot putter

The Belarusian shot putter Nadezya Ostapchuk won the gold medal at the 2012 London Olympics. But she tested positive for a steroid. As a result, she lost the medal which was given to Valeria Adams of New Zealand.
Two tests manifested that a steroid’s metabolites presented in her urine samples.
If a sportsperson is caught administering any forbidden medicines, he/she is usually sentenced to a ban of two years. As for Nadezya Ostapchuk, she received one-year ban. Why was the sentence lighter? There were several circumstances which proved the following condition: the shop putter didn’t take any prohibited medicine intentionally.
At the beginning the shot putter blamed his former coach. She confirmed that he had sabotaged her sample.
The Belarusian National Anti-Doping Agency examined this case. The International Association of Athletic Federation also took part in the investigation. It was found out that Yefimov was guilty. This person put powder of methenolone into food of the Belarusian shot putter during the last week before the 2012 Summer Olympics. The coach confirmed that he had worried about the shot putter. He thought that this steroid would help to win.
In fact, it is difficult to understand why Yefimov has done it. He only caused the problem.
Anti-doping agencies accepted these affirmations. That’s why Nadezya Ostapchuk received just one-year ban.
As for supporters of Valeria Adams, they didn’t believe that Nadezya Ostapchuk had not applied the steroid knowingly. They claimed that Yefimov just tried to protect Nadezya Ostapchuk. They affirmed that Nadezya Ostapchuk had taken steroids under recommendations of her coach.
If Nadezya Ostapchuk’s performance was amazing certain months before the 2012 Summer Olympics, her trainer had to be sure that she would win. Why did he worry about her performance?

Feds want to know whether certain athletes have experienced erectile dysfunctions

Several sportspersons who are suspected of steroid use become targets of the government. Feds do almost everything in order to determine whether some athletes have used any doping products. They don’t spare taxpayers’ funds for this goal. Much money is wasted to disclose even private life of sportspersons. According to the government, some details of their private behavior can reveal the truth about intake of prohibited products. Thus, girlfriends of certain sportspersons are interviewed by federal prosecutors.
For example, it has been revealed that former girlfriends of Lance Armstrong and Roger Clemens and a former mistress of Barry Bonds have been asked about some details connected with private life of these athletes. Which questions were asked?
Kimberly Bell, a former mistress of Barry Bonds, was asked about testicles of this athlete. She confirmed that the baseball player’s testicles were shrunken. So, her answer served as an argument that Barry Bonds used steroids and/or other forbidden medications.
It is known that shrinkage of testicles belongs to side reactions of some steroids. Thus, the government decided to learn whether Barry Bonds had had this problem. But it is a poor argument in order to prove that someone has administered several prohibited preparations. Steroid users can prevent this negative result, if they apply certain products for this need.
Mindy McCready, a former mistress of Roger Clemens, was asked whether this former athlete had had erectile dysfunctions. The woman affirmed that sometimes Roger Clemens had experienced this problem.
When it comes to erectile dysfunctions, they may occur during administration of steroids. But if you study information about adverse consequences of steroids more attentively, you can comprehend that this problem is more likely to appear after discontinuation of application. It happens because natural secretion of testosterone is usually suppressed by application of exogenous testosterone. But since there are such medicines that have ability to restore natural testosterone secretion, erectile dysfunctions can be avoided.
Sheryl Crow, a former girlfriend of Lance Armstrong, was also targeted by the government. But questions are not disclosed. According to some suggestions, she might have been asked also about sexuality of the 7-time Tour de France winner.
Actually, the government has a wrong opinion in this case. Although testicular atrophy and erectile dysfunctions may occur because of steroids, these arguments are not proper.

Don Hooton: steroids can lead to certain serious health problems

Several medicines are called “performance-enhancing drugs”. What do these products represent? Why have been they named “performance-enhancing”? Various individuals may present different definitions. Let mention what an adolescent believes! Before presenting her opinion it is important to mention that her brother, Taylor Hooton, had serious depression after usage of steroids. Finally, he committed suicide. He desired to look like Melky Cabrera, Barry Bonds and other prominent sportspersons that have administered steroids. But his death came suddenly. His sister believes that performance-enhancing drugs are dangerous preparations. They are named “performance-enhancing drugs” in order to lure young people who desire to improve their appearances and performances.
Don Hooton, Taylor’s father, formed a foundation to teach youth about risks linked with steroids. He describes which risks are associated with usage of anabolic steroids and other related medications. He also uses slideshow presentations in order to explain that these drugs may cause such negative effects, as diabetes, heart diseases, liver dysfunctions, etc.
Don Hooton tries to teach young people about severe risks related to administration of steroids. But he admits that it is not easy. He confirms that many young individuals apply doping products. When their friends see that they become stronger and more muscular, they desire to be like them. They follow their examples in order to improve appearance and have more endurance.
Unluckily, certain parents believe that their children are free from steroid use. Some of them believe that their daughters don’t administer steroids because these drugs are recommended to get muscles and body weight in general. But according to numerous sources, girls also apply steroids. They take these preparations in order to lose fat. Some parents don’t know that anabolic steroids are also administered to burn fat. That’s why adults also should be educated about effects of steroids. Moreover, certain parents think that their children don’t take steroids because these medications are expensive. But it is enough to have 20-500 dollars in order to purchase steroids for a cycle.
It is affirmed that every16th high school student applies steroids. But this point of view is mistaken. Every 16th high school student admits to applying doping products.   But numerous persons hide that they apply these preparations.
Those who listen to Don Hooton’s presentations about steroids express their thanks. They are thankful that they may get knowledge about these products.

Hypocrites fight against steroid use in sports

It is known that anabolic steroids are often demonized. If an athlete or a bodybuilder administers steroids and/or other performance-enhancing drugs, he/she is called a cheater. Journalists report about such individuals as about those who have spoiled their reputation. Anti-doping officers put great efforts and spend money in other to determine whether certain athletes have doped. Even the government spends taxpayers’ funds and time in order to prove that some sportspersons have administered steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. It is confirmed that those that dope take unfair advantages during competitions.
Numerous articles describe the war on steroids. But let see whether arguments against administration of steroids are strong enough to prove that it is disgraceful to administer them.
It is claimed that steroid-using athletes serve as a bad example for kids and young people. It is known that youth sees numerous sports stars that take steroids and other related remedies. As a result, young persons desire to look and be as strong, as these celebrated sports figures.  Furthermore, it is widely disputed about health dangers connected with steroids. But if you are attentive, you can notice that these arguments are weak because hypocrisy reigns here.
Let examine the most frequently used arguments against administration of anabolic steroids and/or other related products.
According to the first argument, intake of steroids is closely associated with several probable health dangers. Numerous articles warn about testicular atrophy and enlargement of heart that may occur on account of steroid use. However it may be true, let analyze our life. We consume unhealthy food, however we know that it destroys our health. Several individuals administer antidepressants which are also quite unsafe. We do also other unhealthy things.
According to another argument against steroids, steroid-using sportspersons take unfair advantages in competitions. They win because they enhance performance with these medications. Let pay attention what happens in other areas, for example, in the world of entertainment.  A lot of actors and actresses improve their appearances and performances in order to play several roles in movies. They also have unfair advantages over others with the help of certain surgeries and other things. But they are not sentenced to bans.
While it is confirmed that steroid-using sportspersons send bad messages to young individuals that want to look like them and follow their examples, no one notices about the bad example of actors and actresses. Young girls also desire to look like those they see in magazines.
While federal agents pursue sportspersons that take steroids, they have nothing to do with actors and actresses who act like steroid-using athletes.
It is clear that arguments against usage of steroids are quite weak. They display hypocrisy that reigns in our counterfeit world.

Anti-doping officials: it is strange that Nadzeya Ostapchuk has been caught using metenolone

Nadzeya Ostapchuk, a Belarusian shot putter, won the 2012 Olympic gold medal. But the athlete lost the medal because she was caught using the anabolic steroid metenolone (methenolone). She provided two samples. The substance metenolone was found in both urine samples.
If you read news linked with doping, you must know that professional sportspersons and bodybuilders are usually caught applying other steroids and/or performance-enhancing drugs. But when it comes to Nadzeya Ostapchuk, she was caught using metenolone. It is unusual, according to statements of anti-doping officers. What does this prohibited preparation represent? Why don’t athletes ordinarily use this drug for enhancement of performance?
Metenolone is an anabolic steroid. It has weak androgenic features. It acts like testosterone, increasing muscle mass and adding strength.
Although this steroid possesses just weak androgenic nature, it causes development of sex male features in women. Women who administer this drug may face typical signs of virilization: the voice becomes deeper; excessive hair grows on the face and on other parts of the body; etc.
This steroid can be administered orally or through injections.
Metenolone (Methenolone) benefits greatly, when it is applied by athletes during their workouts. It is not applied during competitions. It doesn’t work, if it is taken only on the day of a competition.
It is also stated that it is easy to catch those who take this anabolic steroid.
Adverse consequences of Metenolone (Methenolone) depend upon quantities which are used. They include water retention, elevated calcium level in the blood, bone growth, hirsutism, acne formation, hair loss, menstrual irregularities, increased libido, etc.
So, if you see a female athlete who has deep voice and excessive hair growth on the body, you may suspect her of steroid use. In fact, it is wrong because these problems may occur also in those women who don’t administer any steroids. But sometimes these signs demonstrate that certain female athletes administer products that have androgenic properties.

Australian doctor practiced medicine improperly 9 years

Certain physician abuse their position, prescribing medicines that don’t meet criteria of clinical needs of patients. Why do they do it? It is known that several drugs are considered to be prescription drugs. It means that you can’t purchase them legally, if you don’t have any prescription from your treating physician. Anabolic steroids belong to such drugs. It is illegal to buy steroids without a prescription in some countries. Those that do it may be punished. They may be sentenced to prison and/or fine. Undoubtedly, a lot of individuals are looking for ways to buy and administer these medications without having legal troubles.
Anabolic steroids are frequently abused. Many athletes and bodybuilders apply these medicines not for medical needs but for increase of performance. If they live in countries where these drugs can’t be bought legally without prescriptions, they find some ways to mask their illicit purchase and application. Sportspeople, bodybuilders and even ordinary people ask their doctors to prescribe them these products, as if they had clinical needs to apply them. Thus, some doctors induce selling anabolic steroids to those who abuse them. Here is a case.
Peter Grant, an Australian health care provider, recommended steroids to 14 patients during nine years. Medical state of these persons didn’t require application of these drugs. So, the doctor was accused of inappropriate practicing medicine. For example, he recommended to a patient applying such preparations, as Halotestin, Sustanon, Andriol Testocaps, Deca Durabolin, Scitropin and Proviron. But there was no any medical basis to prescribe these drugs to this man. Furthermore, these drugs were recommended him during 9 years.
The doctor Peter Grant acknowledged that several patients were competing. Thus, he prescribed them steroids. He also admitted to studying scientific literature about anabolic steroids. He confirmed that he knew how steroids acted. Thus, he supervised the patients that took anabolic steroids.
Taking these aspects into account, it is possible to state that the physician Peter Grant was better known by those that administered steroids for performance-enhancing effects than by those who had to be treated from several health troubles. Peter Grant affirmed that he knew that steroids were purchased by his patients only for personal use.
When the physician appeared in the court, the judge confirmed that the physician induced selling steroids. The judge added that Peter Grant had to be punished appropriately. Peter Grant was suspended from practicing medicine for 12 months. Furthermore, the judge claimed that he would be disciplined during the next 2 years.

Federal prosecutors intended to question Sheryl Crow about Lance Armstrong’s doping

The American professional cyclist Lance Armstrong was accused of doping. It was suspected that the athlete had used EPO and other forbidden drugs.
Many individuals provided their testimonies in the court during the investigation linked with Lance Armstrong’s case. A former girlfriend of the cyclist was also targeted. She had to appear in the court. Several sports journalists noticed that the musician Sheryl Crow had been interviewed by feds.
Lance Armstrong and Sheryl Crow were considered to be one of the most famous couples. They spent much time together. The musician lived with the seven-time winner of Tour de France in Spain. The musician travelled with Lance Armstrong during his trainings. They were in a close relationship, when the cyclist won Tour de France the 7th time.
Lance Armstrong’s former teammates Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton claimed that Lance Armstrong had administered banned preparations. They also affirmed that the athlete had been the leader of a doping group. In addition to these statements, Floyd Landis and Tyler Hamilton claimed that Armstrong’s apartment had been full of equipment utilized for administration of banned products. These persons were going to testify against Lance Armstrong. They confirmed that the cyclist had won Tour de France 7 times because of prohibited preparations.
As for the musician Sheryl Crow, she didn’t appear in the court because the case against the 7-time Tour de France winner was dropped prior to the hearing.
While the government dropped the case, the USADA continued to pursue the former athlete. As a result, Lance Armstrong lost his titles. He was also sentenced to life-time ban from professional sports. Luckily, his charity against cancer was not affected at all. Sponsors continue to support Lance Armstrong and donate. Although his titles are forfeited, Lance Armstrong is appreciated because he helps many persons in their efforts against cancer.

Does Derek Jeter dope?

The ESPN2 journalist Skip Bayless accuses Derek Jeter, a baseball player, of steroid use. He has pronounced his thoughts of criticism during the talk show “First take”.
Actually, the ESPN2 journalist doesn’t have any basis in order to suppose that Derek Jeter takes banned medications. Despites this fact, the statements of the ESPN2 journalist have been spread. Before accusing Derek Jeter of doping, Skip Bayless started to criticize anti-doping system of the MLB. He noticed that the MLB’s tests for banned products are not advanced enough to detect those who use banned medicines.
The journalist Skip Bayless reminded Victor Conte’s point of view related to testosterone:epitestosterone ratio test which is utilized in the MLB. This method is not sophisticated enough to catch those who use banned preparations. Instead of this method, it is necessary to utilize another. Carbon isotope ratio is more sophisticated.
The ESPN2 journalist also stated that the MLB didn’t have any testing for HGH. The test for this product is performed in the MLB only once per year. But blood tests for this product should be performed more times during year. Under other circumstances, players may apply this medicine and avoid detection.
Thus, the journalist believes that Derek Jeter applies HGH and other performance-enhancing drugs. Skip Bayless also confirms that if he were a baseball player, he would choose HGH.
So, the ESPN2 journalist supposes that MLB players apply HGH and probably other banned products without being detected by anti-doping officers.
It is quite obvious that the steroid era in baseball is not over. Professional baseball players administer different banned medicines and avoid detection. But no one can accuse an athlete of steroid use, basing just on improper drug testing. It is necessary to focus on facts, accusing an athlete of administration of forbidden medications. Otherwise, any suspicion doesn’t have any value.

MLB player created fake web site to avoid 50-game suspension

It happens often that when athletes test positive for any banned medications, they try to prove that they have never applied any banned product intentionally. They are looking for different ways to manifest that they are innocent. They do a lot in order to prevent suspensions and/or other sanctions. Here is a case.
The professional baseball player Melky Cabrera tested positive for testosterone. Undoubtedly, he was sentenced to a ban. Like other sportspersons he decided to find a way to prove his innocence and avoid the suspension.
A lot of doping sportspeople that are caught claim that they have taken a dietary supplement which led to positive for certain banned substance. However some athletes may have administered contaminated dietary supplements, numerous sportspersons apply steroids and choose this method of defense because it works in many situations.
So, Melky Cabrera affirmed that he had applied a dietary supplement which led to his positive for testosterone. In fact, it was a lie. Trying to prevent the 50-game suspension, he also created a web site and posted a fictitious product and advertisements which promoted selling it. The product didn’t exist in reality. It was just a lie of Melky Cabrera and his associates in order to defend the baseball player.
Juan Nunez, a paid consultant for Athletes’ Career Enhanced and Secured Incorporated (ACES), created the site.
But the hoax turned out to be unsuccessful. The MLB could expose the baseball player and Juan Nunez. So, the baseball player was enforced to serve the suspension.
The ACES was also troubled. Since Juan Nunez has been a consultant for ACES, the agency and Seth and Sam Levinson were accused of involving in the lie. But these persons claimed that they were not implicated in the creation of the site and the lie which was thought out by Melky Cabrera and Juan Nunez. Juan Nunez also confirmed that Seth and Sam Levinson had not been involved in this defense.
The case is still investigated by the Food and Drug Administration. It is unclear yet whether other individuals would be also pursued and punished for the lie.

Prostitutes look attractive because of corticosteroids

Recently Australian Customs and Border Protection arrested four individuals that had the anabolic steroids Oxandrolone (Anavar) and Primoteston Depot (testosterone). Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam desired to smuggle these medications to Bangladesh. The preparations were confiscated and these men were detained.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper presented a report about this case, claiming that 4 men were arrested while they wanted to traffic steroids that were intended for usage by prostitutes in Bangladesh. This report surprised a lot of people. What does The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper inform about? Do prostitutes apply the same medicines like sportspersons and bodybuilder who try to improve their performance, increasing muscle mass and energy? Why do prostitutes apply anabolic steroids? Which is the goal?
Some individuals understood that it was wrong to write that Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam wanted to smuggle the steroids in order to inject prostitutes with them. Undoubtedly, prostitutes don’t apply anabolic steroids. There is confusion here. Prostitutes apply corticosteroids that differ from anabolic steroids wholly. Corticosteroids cause other effects. They have capacity to increase performance in prostitutes. While anabolic steroids increase muscle size and decrease fat deposits, corticosteroids induce wasting muscles and increase body fat levels.
Orexadon is one of catabolic steroids taken by prostitutes. Those that take this medication look healthier and more attractive. So, such prostitutes who apply this preparation have more clients.
A prostitute who administers Orexadon confirms that she can serve up to 15 clients per day.
So, it is possible to affirm that prostitutes don’t apply anabolic steroids which are commonly indicated for performance-enhancing effects in sports and bodybuilding. Corticosteroids are more proper drugs for them.
The Sydney Morning Herald newspaper published a false piece of news. Andrew Almada, Cheuk Fai Chan, Prabal Islam and Mohammed Islam didn’t smuggle steroids for prostitutes in Bangladesh.

Steroid users should prepare such drugs, as HCG and Clomid

When you buy steroids for cycles, you should also get such compounds which must be used to get recovery after application of steroids.
In case a cycle with steroids lasts more than 8 weeks, HCG should be applied during the cycle. It is important to take in consideration that this drug is administered just during steroid use.
There such medicines that should be taken after steroid use. For example, Clomid should be used after steroid use. It is necessary to start taking this product after androgen levels fall significantly and recovery with this medicine becomes possible. It is usually advised to start administering Clomid with an increased dose (300 mg/day) and reduce it gradually till 50 mg daily. Then low measures are applied until steroid users become convinced that natural production of testosterone is restored and testicles have returned to their ordinary size.
If Clomid is taken circa 6 weeks and no improvement is seen, it is recommended to interrupt administration of this medication. Then if improvements don’t occur, it is required to continue administering Clomid till recovery is gotten. It is permitted to administer this drug a year. Certain studies have displayed that long-term usage of this remeduy doesn’t cause severe problems. However certain persons may experience vision troubles because of Clomid, these problems are not irreversible. They disappear after discontinuation of intake. If any negative effects related to vision system appear in those that administer Clomid, they must stop applying this preparation.
Clomid may be also used after steroid cycles. A common dosage is 75 mg a day in such situations.
Although there are such drugs that help to get recovery after steroid cycles and keep strength and muscle gains, it is not recommended to have prolonged steroid cycles.

Clomid and Nolvadex during/after steroid cycles

Numerous individuals frequently ask which product is more suitable for a PCT: Clomid or Nolvadex. While several steroid users affirm that Clomid is better for this need, others claim that Nolvadex is more suitable. Certain persons note that Clomid and Nolvadex should be stacked.
When you examine structures of these medications, you can see that they have similar structures. That’s why they have certain similar characteristics. But the most of individuals and even specialists affirm that Clomid and Nolvadex are wholly different drugs. Which basis does this point of view have? These medications are utilized in medicine for various purposes. Nolvadex is indicated for treatment of breast cancer in women. When it comes to Clomid, it is administered in case of infertility. That’s why it is believed that these are entirely different medications.
Actually, they may be also administered for various purposes in bodybuilding and sports. Clomid is recommended in order to get recovery after a steroid cycle during a PCT. When it comes to Nolvadex, it is ordinarily administered as an anti-estrogen compound.
Comparing potency of these products, it is possible to see that Nolvadex is more powerful anti-estrogen compound than Clomid.
Both Clomid and Nolvadex are able to decrease levels of estrogen, stimulating hypothalamus to secrete greater quantities of testosterone.
As for dosages of these medications, they differ because one of them is more potent than another. Clomid should be utilized in higher doses. So, such measures of Nolvadex, as 20-40 mg, produce more obvious effects than 100-150 mg of Clomid.
Nolvadex is not the most potent anti-estrogen. Such drugs, as Proviron, Arimidex and Viratase, are claimed to be more powerful but Nolvadex and Clomid work faster.
Sometimes Clomid or Nolvadex may be administered together with Arimidex or Proviron during a steroid cycle. Such stacks are ordinarily taken in case of gynecomastia.
When you desire to choose which drug you should use: Nolvadex or Clomid, you should take into account certain aspects.
Nolvadex has positive impact on cholesterol levels. It also has more direct influence on natural production of testosterone than Clomid. As it has been already noted, Nolvadex is more potent than Clomid. In addition to these positive features, Nolvadex is safer. Furthermore, Nolvadex leads to less severe negative consequences than Clomid because more decreased doses are required to produce wanted effects. Furthermore, while unwanted effects of Clomid are permanent, those of Nolvadex disappear after discontinuation of application. The only priority of Clomid is following: it helps to stoare more potential gains than Nolvadex.
Knowing these differences between Nolvadex and Clomid, steroid users can make their choice appropriately.