Tom Verducci notices that doping has nothing to do with moral issues

The American sportswriter Tom Verducci explains about debates linked with possibility of steroid users to be voted into the Baseball Hall of Fame. But as it commonly happens, this explanation shows only confusion of reporters about steroids.
The Baseball Writers Association of America (BWAA)  is a professional association of baseball reporters that chose players for the National Baseball Hall of Fame. All writers that are members of the BWAA already not less than 10 years have opportunity to elect up to 10 players for the Hall of Fame.
Recently a debate took place between members of the BWAA. They discussed whether admitted or just suspected consumers of steroids and other prohibited medications might entry into Cooperstown.
Members of the BWAA usually must comment their votes:  they should explain why they have voted pro or contra certain affirmations. Some of them claim that doping destroys the integrity of sports and administration of banned medicines is frequently claimed by them to be immoral.
As for Tom Verducci, he doesn’t confirm that administration of steroids is necessarily a moral question. This American sportswriter says that steroids help users to take unfair advantage over those who don’t dope. According to Tom Verducci, performance-enhancing drugs make competitions unfair. Thus, administration of forbidden medications induces unfairness in sports.  That’s why Tom Verducci denies any connection between doping and morality. This sportswriter claims that it is a question that is connected with performance but not to morality. So, this sportswriter suggests that users of steroids must not be allowed to be in the Hall of Fame. But he has voted for the admitted steroid user Jeff Bagwell. This athlete has admitted that he had taken androstenedione. It is important to mention that this medication was not enumerated among anabolic steroids, when Bagwell administrated it. According to the Control Act 2004, it is listed among forbidden preparations. Since it wasn’t legally clamed to be a steroid, Verducci decided to vote for the consumer of this preparation; however, it was always considered to be an anabolic-androgenic steroid by specialists. Moreover, it was said that Bagwell just became bigger but didn’t improve his performance due to administration of androstenedione.
Nevertheless, the decision of Tom Verducci to vote for the admitted user of the steroid is quite controversial. The following question appears: “Maybe Tom Verducci is not against intake of steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs by sportspersons?”  Since this sportswriter doesn’t agree that intake of steroids is a moral question, he may suppose that increase of performance is not a real problem.
Many people suppose that intake of steroids represents evil because they are illegal.