It is unclear why police officers that use deadly force will be tested for steroids

Numerous people believe that “roid rage” or uncontrolled aggressive behavior is a normal undesirable effect which occurs in those that administrate steroids. Moreover, certain individuals consider that it is even impossible to prevent this undesirable reaction, if you utilize steroids. Nonetheless, it is not proven scientifically that it is a real negative symptom of anabolic steroids. But even if we suppose that it exists, it may occur just in small number of steroid users.
Since a lot of individuals say that “roid rage” is a side reaction of anabolic steroids, many ill-informed legislative suggestions were made. Certain such proposals have been made in Oregon. It has been proposed to introduce certain new laws. According to these new laws, if any police officers  have used deadly force, or if police force resulted in certain injuries, they should be tested for steroids.
The politician Lew Frederick has made the same proposal in Oregon House of Representatives. Those police officials who have been involved in deadly force will be investigated, tested for some drugs and their mental health will be also evaluated.
Actually, it is not clear why police officials that are involved in deadly force will be tested for steroids. Can usage of steroids prove that application of deadly force was unjustified? Is it claimed that steroids due to aggressiveness may make police officers unable to make reasonable decisions?
Investigation team is a good idea for police officials who use deadly force. But steroid use should not be taken in consideration here. Positives or negatives for steroids can’t determine whether deadly force has been used appropriately or not. It doesn’t matter a police official has applied steroids, aspirin or just drunk juice.
Thus, it is possible to conclude that legislators turn to be captivated by hysteria related to “roid rage” of anabolic steroids.  It goes without saying that illegal intake of steroids by police officials must be a legitimate concern. But it is not spoken about uncontrolled aggressive behavior as a principal reason in this case. The problem is that illegal administration of controlled substances by police officers makes them vulnerable to corruption and the black market of steroids.  Such police officers are inclined to compromise.