Jurors have acquitted Roger Clemens; government criticizes them

Names of twelve individuals (4 men and 8 women) who belonged to jury at the case against the athlete Roger Clemens were released by the judge Reggie Walton.
The government wanted the jury to be convinced that the baseball player had lied before the Congress about administration of steroids and HGH. But since the jury didn’t believe it, the government criticized the individuals who served as the jury. Several persons who acted as the jury were interviewed.
A political activist, an art historian, a teacher of deaf kids, an official of Treasury Department and an employee of the Canadian Embassy composed the jury.
The political activist Joyce Robinson-Paul was interviewed by the New York Daily News several days after Roger Clemens was cleared of the charges. She noted that the jury comprehended that they had to be fair to both the government and the baseball player. But they didn’t find anything that had to be pursued.  Later she also noticed that the government couldn’t prove their suspicions.
The employee of the Canadian Embassy Bradford Weaver affirmed that the government was wrong. He noted that such cases should not be repeated. He also made it clear that there was nothing to be prosecuted. Bradford Weaver was interviewed by the Associated Press. This person also noted that every juror comprehended from the very beginning that Roger Clemens was not proven guilty of any charge. This person pointed that each juror was unanimous.
Bradford Weaver was also asked whether he considered that Roger Clemens really used steroids. Journalists of the Associated Press also asked him whether he thought that the governmental case against the baseball player represented only the waste of taxpayers’ funds. But Bradford Weaver didn’t answer the questions.
Another juror that chose not to be identified claimed that the jurors didn’t understand how the government could spend huge sums of money during 5 years in order to prosecute the athlete. This person noted that it was impossible to comprehend why the prosecution took place 5 years.
Other jurors didn’t provide any information.
As for feds, they were wholly disappointed. They refused to respond to the affirmations presented by the jurors.